Konkretna tema nije adekvatna za ovakvu raspravu jer je ona namenjena isključivo dokonim ljudima za zajebanciju.Dersu Uzala wrote: Total za godista za koja si se ti natakario...
Prema tome otvori novu temu o LP, može biti poučno.
Vrlo bitno – ja nisam ekspert za LP gitare. Nisam ekspert ni za jedan model i nikada to nisam ni tvrdio. Samo sam video i probao par komada u životu.
Ipak, svi stari LP koje sam videouživo ili na fotografijama su imali javor pokrivku.
Kada već voliš Wikipediu evo ti dela koji nisi citirao, a govori o prvim LP koji su pušteni na tržište 1952 što znači da ja ništa nisam „natakario“ kako pišeš već je tada počela komercijalna prodaja:
“The 1952 Les Paul featured two P-90 single coil pickups, and a one-piece, 'trapeze'-style bridge and tailpiece, with strings that were fitted under (instead of over) a steel stop-bar.[note 3] The weight and the tonal characteristics of the Les Paul were largely due to the mahogany and maple construction: maple is a hard and quite heavy wood, but was restricted to a cap over somewhat lighter mahogany, to keep weight under control.[note 4] In addition, the early 1952 Les Pauls were never issued serial numbers, did not have bound bodies, and are considered by some as "LP Model prototypes". However, the later 1952 Les Pauls were issued serial numbers and also came with bound bodies. Interestingly, the design scheme of some of these early models varied. For instance, some of the Les Pauls of this issue were fitted with black covered P90 pickups instead of the cream-colored plastic covers that are associated with this guitar, even today. Of note, these early models, nicknamed "Goldtops", have begun to gain the interest of collectors, and subsequently, the associated nostalgic value of this instrument is increasing.”
Svi LP 52 koje sam pronašao na fotografijama, a da nisu goldtop izgledaju ovako:
Na Gibsonovom sajtu se može pronaći podatak o novim potpuno mahagonij LP gde stoji da to rade po uzoru na neke modele Custom i Special iz prošlosti ne navodeći striktno godine replika.